February 7, 2012

Twitter is a craze even for blog writing services

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...

Image via CrunchBase

 Any blog services strategy today includes content distribution through Twitter. Using a blog writing service, can they help you grow your Twitter following?

Twitter isn’t in the Oxford English Dictionary yet, but more than 175 million people have added it to their vocabularies and use its 140 character posts to answer the question “What are you doing?”

Inventing new words may be part of the game with Twitter, as people have adopted a whole new language. Twitter people are Tweeple. A Twitter meetup is a Tweetup. And on and on.

InTwigued? To put Twitter’s 4 million users in perspective, when Facebook was getting similar attention, its ranks numbered 24 million. So is Twitter overrated or as valuable as its fans claim? And will it be around long enough to make it worth our time?

Time is one feature that Twitter boasts. It offers users real time connection, an instant, short glimpse into all the moments between emails and blog posts. Friends could find these momentary updates useful when we’re looking to join the party or running late for lunch, and businesses are beginning to employ Twitter marketing to announce short-term specials, like the deal of the day. Twitter even scooped more traditional media with first news and instant updates of recent earthquakes,rocket attacks, and plane crashes. We all hope catastrophes are few are far between. So do the many people or businesses who have news that’s noteworthy enough to fill the moments between blog posts and e-blasts.

For many, Twitter is truly like a micro-blog, like using only the status section of Facebook. Fans say this feature inspires conversation and connections. It can also provide the curious spark that drives “followers” to blog posts, Facebook pages, and more in-depth web presences. When Barack Obama used Twitter during his presidential campaign, some argued that his tweets got followers to visit more than just web sites. Either way, the voters visited the polls.

And while Twitter users may number just a fraction of other online social networks’ crowds, Facebook did float a $500 million stock offer to bring Twitter into its realm. That’s 500 million reasons that Facebook thinks Twitter will stay and grow.

Several Twitterers we know admit to feeling like they were in their own foggy Twitter bubble (Twubble?) when they first joined the network. John H. suggested new users should be warned with a disclaimer, something like, “Warning: During your first 30 days of using Twitter, you will have no idea what the heck is going on. Only after 30 days will you begin to understand its value.”

Several other users confessed to giving up within those first 30 days after tiring of the useless updates and the time wasted. It seems most of us are Twittering and following tweets to be part of the experiment, to learn to tailor the Twitterers we follow to accomplish our own information goals and to enjoy the simplicity of short, quick updates.

So is Twitter overrated? Our opinion is no, it’s got nowhere to go but up. But maybe you think differently. Is Twitter is an endangered species under the pressure of larger social networks? Leave your comments (even with more than 140 characters).

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Squirrels Refuse Medical Care, Blame the Economy

Squirrels Refuse Medical Care, Blame the EconomyErik Deckers
Laughing Stalk syndicate
Copyright 2010

"Squirrels Refuse Medical Care."

Yes, that's a real headline. No, it wasn't from The Onion. It was the Washington Post. The Washington "We Broke Watergate" Post.

In late September, in Alexandria, Virginia, someone called Animal Control about an injured squirrel on the sidewalk in a residential neighborhood. When an Animal Control officer showed up, the squirrel scrambled up a tree.

The Animal Control officer saw another squirrel nearby, also on the sidewalk, but it appeared dazed. He took it back to the Animal Welfare League to examine it further, but the squirrel woke up and "resisted attempts to be handled." So the officer returned the squirrel to the area where it had originally been found.

An extremely slow news day nowithstanding, I was intrigued at the idea of squirrels who would refuse medical care. The AWL is supported by taxes, so it's more of a free clinic than a for-profit hospital, but his actions were a little odd, even for a squirrel.

I took a quick trip to Arlington, to see what I could learn. A quick visit to the Animal Welfare League office and a peek at the call log, and I was able to find the squirrels' neighborhood.

I had a little trouble tracking down the squirrels' home, but finally found it, a big oak duplex in a neighborhood of single family oaks and maples. I knocked on the door.

"Who is it?" demanded a squirrel, opening the door. "What do you want?"

"Mr. Mosher?" I said.

"No, Mathus. Mosher lives next door. You from the government?" Mathus accused. At the sound of his name, Mosher opened his door.

"Can I help you?" he said.

"I'm wondering about this story in the Washington Post. It says that you were both involved in some kind of incident, but you refused medical treatment."

"Well, it was hardly a serious injury," said Mosher. "We were arguing about the mid-term elections, when a gust of wind knocked us off our branch. We were both sort of dazed, but when that Animal Control officer showed up, I didn't need any medical attention, so I went home. I thought Mathus was right behind me."

"So you were the one who went to the Animal Welfare League?" I asked Mathus.

"Taken against my will, you mean," said Mathus. "If I hadn't refused treatment, they probably would have put me in one of those death camps. I made such a stink they had no choice but to bring me back home."

"Now, Jimmy, you know there's no such thing as 'death camps,'" said Mosher. "That was just a big lie Sarah Palin made up to scare people about health care reform."

"So you say," spat Mathus. "All I know is I wasn't going to let some knock on the noggin give them an excuse to put me in a camp or some home against my will."

I wrote a few notes, and turned to the other squirrel. "What about you, Mr. Mosher? The newspaper said that when you were approached by the officer, you ran back into your home."

Mosher looked down at his feet. When he spoke, his voice was quiet, embarrassed. "I don't have any insurance, and I knew a trip to the emergency room would wipe me out. I thought if I hid, he would just leave me alone."

"That's because he lost his job, thanks to Obama's so-called stimulus spending," said Mathus.

"Actually, if you'll recall, James," interrupted Mosher, "I lost my job three weeks after Obama took office. In fact, our whole division got laid off, because our workload was being outsourced overseas."

"Bah," said Mathus, waving his paw.

"Anyway," continued Mosher. "I was just resting after the fall. I figured I'd stay with Jimmy until he was awake. But when that big guy showed up, I panicked. I don't have much in savings, what with the economy and all. So when he came, I was worried they were going to perform a bunch of needless tests and bill me right into bankruptcy."

"See? That's Obamacare for you!" said Mathus. "They'll do anything to get your money.

"Jimmy, the new healthcare plan doesn't go into effect for another year. Besides, healthcare money doesn't go to the government."

The two squirrels fell to bickering about healthcare reform, the economy, and the war, sounding more and more like TV pundits (only smarter). While the recession may be over, it's going to be a long, slow road to recovery. And when squirrels are refusing medical help for fear of losing their life savings, I can only imagine how things are going for the rest of us.

I mumbled my thanks to the politically active squirrels, and left. I still had to interview a groundhog about extending the Bush-era tax cuts.

---
Like this post? Leave a comment, Digg it, or Stumble it.

Second Nature by Neil Peart

These lyrics were written in the late 80s by Neil Peart.  It was the beginning of the political discourse in which we live today.  The beginning of Rush Limbaugh.  The era of Lee Atwater.  Our national discourse has gotten progressively worse since that time.  We are becoming more European in our skepticism and mistrust of each other.  These lyrics really speak to our times.

Second Nature lyrics

A memo to a higher office
Open letter to the powers that be
To a god, a king, a head of state
A captain of industry
To the movers and the shakers…
Can’t everybody see?

It ought to be second nature
I mean, the places where we live
Let’s talk about this sensibly
We’re not insensitive
I know progress has no patience
But something’s got to give

I know you’re different
You know I’m the same
We’re both too busy
To be taking the blame
I’d like some changes
But you don’t have the time
We can’t go on thinking
It’s a victimless crime
No one is blameless
But we’re all without shame
We fight the fire while we’re feeding the flames

Folks have got to make choices
And choices got to have voices
Folks are basically decent
Conventional wisdom would say
But we read about the exceptions
In the papers every day

It ought to be second nature
At least, that’s what I feel
Now I lay me down in Dreamland
I know perfect’s not for real
I thought we might get closer
But I’m ready to make a deal

Today is different, and tomorrow the same
It’s hard to take the world the way that it came
Too many rapids keep us sweeping along
Too many captains keep on steering us wrong
It’s hard to take the heat
It’s hard to lay blame
To fight the fire while we’re feeding the flames

Healthcare Debate – It’s out of control

So, Congressmen are going home to speak to constituents and are being bombarded by mobs with pitchforks.

There seems to be a lot of noise, but not much substance.  I have yet to find a decent source that provides non-partisan details about the public health plan being proposed.  Instead, we are bombarded with propaganda from both sides.  The opposition is really from Health Plans that want to keep the status quo.  The support for change is because people want something different than what we have today.

Here is my issue with all of this.  There is no real debate taking place.  There is no real understanding of what the problems are.  Today, it is all noise and conjecture without a real discussion taking place.

What is the problem?  It is all about money.  The opposition are screwing the people clamoring against a Government sponsored plan.  The supporters of the Government sponsored plan are not really addressing the problems associated with high costs.   I think first we need to understand the costs we are being asked to pay.  Then, the population needs to become consumers of their healthcare.

Consumers of their health care.  What does that mean?

I would challenge anyone and ask, do you know how much your doctor charges you for a visit?  If you went into your Doctor’s office and asked, could they provide you a list of services provided and their costs?  The current system is fee for service.  Any service provided, there is an associated fee involved.

When you go to a mechanic, does he have the fees listed of his costs for basic services?  And, if it falls out of that service, doesn’t he provide you with an estimate to fix it?  Does a Doctor’s office, or a hospital do this?

Or that expensive MRI the doctor orders at the hospital?  What does it cost?  No one tells you, they just tell you that you have to pay whatever your insurance company does not cover.  There is no, you pay this!  Insurance company pays that.

Doctor prescribes a drug for you.  You go to the pharmacy and find out is $2.00 a pill.  Wait?  I can’t afford $2.00 a pill.

Where is the cost of healthcare delivery?  Can someone answer that question first?  How is the Government plan addressing it.  How is the opposition addressing it?  (Oh, they are not, they are saying everything is fine the way it is).

Here are a few suggestions:

Step 1 – Go back to cash for services.

A doctor should publish his services like any other service out there. For acute care, Physician groups should be utilizing Nurse Practitioners at a lower per visit cost – say $30 per visit.

Insurance should not even be utilized under fee for acute care.

Step 2 – Healthcare needs to become more efficient.

Physician practices should look across the street and see how their Dentist colleagues run their offices.  They do it efficiently.

(Yeah….yeah…yeah…they don’t have as many complications, etc.  They do it efficiently and make money doing it at a good value).

It can be done.  I have seen it done.  Everyone knows it can be done.  The consensus is Doctors don’t want to see the change.  Here is why:

1.  They don’t want to pay for it
2.  They don’t want to be accountable
3.  They like their pen and paper

(My Doctor uses pen and paper.  I am probably going to change because of it.)

Step 3 – Insurance should be for catastrophic injuries or disease.

Everyone should have health insurance, just like car insurance for that “accident”, or “catastrophic” disease like cancer.

The cost should be no more than 1,200 a year.  A patient or family only utilize it, if they have an accident or are diagnosed with a life threatening disease.

Step 4 – Get rid of the chotzke culture in medical device, pharmaceutical, and all the lunches.

Doctors advertise free lunch as a perk to work in their office, paid for by your favorite pharmaceutical company.  It has an influence on Physician decisions.  It is a freaking bribe and doctors are taking it.

There is a whole industry around supplying pharmaceutical companies with lunches including preparation and delivery.

Step 5 – Disease Management

Everyone says it is a good thing to do.  Physician groups could come up with programs to help their patients manage their diabetes and heart failure.  Make them affordable for patients to use them without insurance.

The value proposition between meds, hospitalization, and simply managing your health properly.  How about an affinity program for good health.  Join this program (pay a value less than what you would normally pay for bad health)  and if you meet your disease objectives, get prizes – a free TV, a free Trip, etc.

The problem with the United States today is that everything is right or left.  It’s either on the right, or it is on the left.  The current Representatives in Congress no longer represent the interests of the people, they are looking out for the special interests that fund their campaigns.

Here is where I have a problem with both parties.  Barack Obama said we have to make tough choices.  Yet, his recommendation is a Government sponsored program.  The Republicans are the “just say no” party.  They say we have the best health care in the world.  (That is another blog post).  Yet, healthcare costs continue to rise in this country.

If we are going to make tough choices, then let’s start by going backwards a little before we go forwards:

1.  Have health care service providers publish their prices
2.  Pay cash for services
3.  Become consumers of our healthcare  (The Doc down the street is charging $30 acute care visits).
4.  Insurance for catastrophic coverage

Let’s have a real debate on this topic.  This isn’t a right or left debate.  It is an economic debate.

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin